An appellate court has thrown out a mitigated negative declaration that the City of Los Angeles approved for a 21-lot subdivision in the Sunland area. The court ruled that project opponents had made a fair argument that the project may have a significant impact on wildlife and traffic. >>read more

Although it was overshadowed by higher-profile cases, a California water controversy decided in late June by the U.S. Supreme Court might have been the most closely watched case by California farmers, water districts and environmentalists. >>read more

A ruling in an endangered species case from Arizona demonstrates how sharply divided federal judges are regarding the legal protections afforded to rare animals and plants. In an extremely short opinion, a Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled 2-1 that the Army Corps of Engineers was not obliged to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the impacts of two proposed housing developments on the ferruginous pygmy owl. >>read more

A limit on the amount of trash that can be discharged into the Los Angeles River has been upheld by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The court rejected a challenge filed by 22 cities in Los Angeles County to a limit established by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. >>read more

A convergence of money, technology and landscape has given rise to a project that is both understated and remarkable. However, the set of forces, circumstances and personalities behind the Letterman Digital Arts Center in San Francisco is unlikely to be matched in the Bay Area or anywhere else. >>read more